While Chad argues that Trump is the bulldozer we need to clear out the deep state, I counter that RFK Jr. is the scalpel we need to cut out the cancer of corporate capture.
"[T]hey measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise." (2 Corinthians 10:12)
To measure one biblically unqualified candidate as opposed to another biblically unqualified candidate is, at best, foolish - especially when both candidates promote the biblically abominable LGBTQers, among other biblically egregious postions.
The only standard by which all candidates should be measured is by the Bible's immutable/unchanging moral law, especially its mandatory biblical qualifications.
But the constitutional framers fixed it so that will never occur when, in Article 6, they banned Christian tests and thereby mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders.
America's consequently known nothing but nincompoops, scoundrels, incompetents, immoral reprobates, and outright criminals for her civil leaders ever since.
And nothing is going to change about this until Christians and patriots become courageous enough to stop participating in the corrupt government and its unbiblical election process and, in turn, begin promoting the Bible's government of, by, and for God and, in turn, His moral law as supreme.
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
For more, regarding Article 6's Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."
You are absolutely correct, YHVH God and His Son are nowhere to be found in the U.S. Constitution. What you have called "the bible's moral law" is nowhere to be found in the U.S. Constitution and consequently nowhere to be found in American society.
The bible's "moral law" is also nowhere to be found in the churches of Christianity as they all adopted theologies against it making various claims that it somehow changed or was done away with.
I take exception to the idea that Article 6 created any problem at all, it did not. Churches have always been totally free to bond together and select "godly" moral law based men as candidates for political office. In the beginning, that is what they did, but over time, they became complacent and eventually abandoned all government to the unbelievers.
Churches are totally free, to this very day, to bind together outside and select good candidates. Even the churches that followed Satan into the 501c3 law are free to do these things.
Here's the problem: First, as you said, most of today's churches are antinomian (anti-Yahweh's law under the New Covenant), including its mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders and are, therefore, oblivious to what constitutes a biblically qualified candidate.
That aside, even if they were to elect a biblically qualified candidate for civil office (has never occurred since the inception of the Constitution as the law of the land), at that person's inauguration *he* would immediately become biblically unqualified at the moment he placed his hand on a Bible, swearing to uphold the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land.
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."
Ah, I see. You are doing that modified "new covenant" thing. That is as fake as a man in the moon.
You had better read Jeremiah 31 over several more times and this time do some real study of what you read and hopefully you'll finally get it right.
You mess up by thinking you or anyone lives in the Jeremiah 31 New Covenant. That is a strategic foundation error and is not congruent to Jeremiah 31. All you have to do is read Jeremiah 31:33 "AFTER THOSE DAYS" then find the reference to "THOSE DAYS" then define what those days actually are.
"THOSE DAYS" are a very special event defined in the Book of Revelation. There is only 1 way to prove it and you have not found it yet because you settled for some of men's teachings instead of what the Scripture says is fact. You also did not do your due diligence in the Greek scripture but I am not going into that mess here.
If you finally get Jeremiah 31 correct, then I think you will eventually see all the other errors/suppositions you have made.
I'll leave you with a teaser...
Hebrews 8:13
In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
Most of the so-called "bible scholars" think Hebrews was written in 63 AD or later.
So, if in 63 CE, if the "old covenant" had not passed away, then when on the earth in time does it finally pass away since Hebrews 8:13 states it is only then, in 63 AD/CE or later, "BECOMING OBSOLETE" ???
I have already looked at your book on that link and I can show you all the apparent mistakes you made.
Much of what you say is true. You did not read/study Jeremiah 31 carefully enough and that is the main reason for your, let's call them "more informed that usual" mistakes. I can't call them minor mistakes because they lead to major misunderstandings but you are more informed/correct than the usual person I meet in discussions like these.
You mentioning Greek/Hebrew manuscripts in your statement of faith is unusual but very good, at least you have figured out a few of the real problems.
I'll read a little further and see what other surprises pop up.
You know, I like RFKjr. He is the only candidate I think might do a little something meaningful. But he has totally blown ballot access, right? He blew it in the Democrat primaries and has blown it as an Independent, as far as I know from what I see. So what's the point?
If that phone call with Trump was real and RFKjr were appointed as Director HHS, and had carte blanche appointments over all subordinate agencies that would be meaningful. Is Trump secretly headed that way or just playing politics?
BEWARE THE TRAP!
"[T]hey measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise." (2 Corinthians 10:12)
To measure one biblically unqualified candidate as opposed to another biblically unqualified candidate is, at best, foolish - especially when both candidates promote the biblically abominable LGBTQers, among other biblically egregious postions.
The only standard by which all candidates should be measured is by the Bible's immutable/unchanging moral law, especially its mandatory biblical qualifications.
But the constitutional framers fixed it so that will never occur when, in Article 6, they banned Christian tests and thereby mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders.
America's consequently known nothing but nincompoops, scoundrels, incompetents, immoral reprobates, and outright criminals for her civil leaders ever since.
And nothing is going to change about this until Christians and patriots become courageous enough to stop participating in the corrupt government and its unbiblical election process and, in turn, begin promoting the Bible's government of, by, and for God and, in turn, His moral law as supreme.
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
For more, regarding Article 6's Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."
You are absolutely correct, YHVH God and His Son are nowhere to be found in the U.S. Constitution. What you have called "the bible's moral law" is nowhere to be found in the U.S. Constitution and consequently nowhere to be found in American society.
The bible's "moral law" is also nowhere to be found in the churches of Christianity as they all adopted theologies against it making various claims that it somehow changed or was done away with.
I take exception to the idea that Article 6 created any problem at all, it did not. Churches have always been totally free to bond together and select "godly" moral law based men as candidates for political office. In the beginning, that is what they did, but over time, they became complacent and eventually abandoned all government to the unbelievers.
Churches are totally free, to this very day, to bind together outside and select good candidates. Even the churches that followed Satan into the 501c3 law are free to do these things.
Marshall, thanks for responding!
Here's the problem: First, as you said, most of today's churches are antinomian (anti-Yahweh's law under the New Covenant), including its mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders and are, therefore, oblivious to what constitutes a biblically qualified candidate.
That aside, even if they were to elect a biblically qualified candidate for civil office (has never occurred since the inception of the Constitution as the law of the land), at that person's inauguration *he* would immediately become biblically unqualified at the moment he placed his hand on a Bible, swearing to uphold the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land.
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."
Ah, I see. You are doing that modified "new covenant" thing. That is as fake as a man in the moon.
You had better read Jeremiah 31 over several more times and this time do some real study of what you read and hopefully you'll finally get it right.
You mess up by thinking you or anyone lives in the Jeremiah 31 New Covenant. That is a strategic foundation error and is not congruent to Jeremiah 31. All you have to do is read Jeremiah 31:33 "AFTER THOSE DAYS" then find the reference to "THOSE DAYS" then define what those days actually are.
"THOSE DAYS" are a very special event defined in the Book of Revelation. There is only 1 way to prove it and you have not found it yet because you settled for some of men's teachings instead of what the Scripture says is fact. You also did not do your due diligence in the Greek scripture but I am not going into that mess here.
If you finally get Jeremiah 31 correct, then I think you will eventually see all the other errors/suppositions you have made.
I'll leave you with a teaser...
Hebrews 8:13
In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
Most of the so-called "bible scholars" think Hebrews was written in 63 AD or later.
So, if in 63 CE, if the "old covenant" had not passed away, then when on the earth in time does it finally pass away since Hebrews 8:13 states it is only then, in 63 AD/CE or later, "BECOMING OBSOLETE" ???
Shalom.
I have already looked at your book on that link and I can show you all the apparent mistakes you made.
Much of what you say is true. You did not read/study Jeremiah 31 carefully enough and that is the main reason for your, let's call them "more informed that usual" mistakes. I can't call them minor mistakes because they lead to major misunderstandings but you are more informed/correct than the usual person I meet in discussions like these.
You mentioning Greek/Hebrew manuscripts in your statement of faith is unusual but very good, at least you have figured out a few of the real problems.
I'll read a little further and see what other surprises pop up.
Nice to meet you, in an unlikely place!
Everyone in the "Freedom" movement ought to be shoving on Trump for RFKjr for HHS and put real solid pressure on Trump.
As far as I could tell RFKjr was just too late to plan for the Democrat Party signature events, poor organization and same things as an Independent.
You know, I like RFKjr. He is the only candidate I think might do a little something meaningful. But he has totally blown ballot access, right? He blew it in the Democrat primaries and has blown it as an Independent, as far as I know from what I see. So what's the point?
If that phone call with Trump was real and RFKjr were appointed as Director HHS, and had carte blanche appointments over all subordinate agencies that would be meaningful. Is Trump secretly headed that way or just playing politics?
RFK/Epstein connection
https://rumble.com/v20iwsm-streaming-with-john-brisson-rfk-and-the-epstein-connection.html