Pastor Ken Peters Exposes the DOJ's War on Faith: Conservative Christians Prosecuted for Standing Up for Life!
There's an ongoing struggle for freedom of speech and expression, particularly for conservative Christians advocating for the sanctity of life.
Tune in to The Jeff Dornik Show LIVE exclusively on Rumble on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 1pm ET.
In a recent episode of The Jeff Dornik Show, my guest Pastor Ken Peters (co-pastor of Patriot Church and founder of The Church at Planned Parenthood) and I tackled a troubling case that underscores the weaponization of the Department of Justice (DOJ) against conservative Christians who peacefully a
dvocate for the pro-life cause. We delved into the prosecution of six anti-abortion protesters who were convicted of violating federal laws by blocking the entrance of a reproductive clinic outside Nashville, Tennessee.
As we discussed the jury's decision to convict the protesters under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act), it became evident that this case represents a clear example of government overreach and selective enforcement of the law. It's alarming to witness such unequal treatment, especially when it pertains to protecting the constitutional rights of conservative Christians like ourselves.
Be prepared for the next pandemic with The Wellness Company's Contagion Emergency Kit! Backed by research and endorsed by experts like Dr. Peter McCullough, this prescription-only kit provides expert-recommended treatments for respiratory illnesses. Stay ready, stay protected!
Use code JEFF for 10% off when you order.
The episode provided insight into the 2021 "blockade" organized at a baby murder “clinic” in Mount Juliet, Tennessee, where anti-abortion supporters peacefully gathered to voice their opposition to abortion procedures. Quite literally, they gathered in a hallway and sat down to pray.
However, the DOJ's decision to prosecute the protesters under the FACE Act raises serious concerns about the government's motives and its commitment to safeguarding the rights of all citizens, regardless of their beliefs. It's troubling to witness the targeting of conservative Christians who are simply exercising their First Amendment rights to protest against the killing of unborn babies.
Moreover, the timing of the prosecution, occurring just months before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, adds complexity to the case. As the debate over abortion rights intensifies, the prosecution of pro-life activists sends a chilling message about the potential repercussions of speaking out against abortion in America.
In conclusion, our episode of The Jeff Dornik Show with Ken Peters sheds light on the ongoing struggle for freedom of speech and expression, particularly for conservative Christians advocating for the sanctity of life. By spotlighting the prosecution of pro-life protesters and the unequal application of the law, we aim to ignite a broader conversation about protecting the rights of all Americans, regardless of their beliefs.
We need to make sure that we are supporting conservative, Christian and pro-life companies and organizations. One of those is Mike Lindell’s MyPillow. Every time you use code FFN, you get MASSIVE discounts, plus you’ll be supporting MyPillow and Freedom First Network. Click here to order using code FFN.
WATCH THE FULL EPISODE OF THE JEFF DORNIK SHOW FEATURING DR BEN TAPPER, PASTOR KEN PETERS, DANIELLE BAKER & MIC MEOW:
Official Christian persecution harkens back to Article 6 and Marbury v Madison and Reynolds v United States, arguably the two most biblically consequential Supreme Court decisions of all time:
"...Consider again the following Supreme Court decision: '...a law repugnant to the Constitution is void.' (Marbury v. Madison (1803))11
"If we believe the law of WE THE PEOPLE is supreme, then all law that contravenes the Constitution, including Yahweh’s commandments, statutes, and judgments, is null and void. Reynolds v. United States (1879) addressed the Mormon Church’s claim that polygamy was a right afforded them under Amendment 1. Because most Americans find polygamy repugnant, the magnitude of Supreme Court Justice Morrison R. Waite’s decision is lost on them [note especially the first and last sentences]"
'Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices. Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice?... So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land.'12
"Contrary to Matthew 7:21-27 and James 1:22-25, the Supreme Court ruled that a man’s actions can be severed and isolated from his faith and judged illegal according to the Constitution and its supplemental edicts. This precedent paved the way for any Christian action based upon a Biblical conviction – such as preaching against sodomy – to be arbitrarily outlawed in the same fashion. Had the framers established Yahweh’s immutable law and its predetermined morality as the supreme law of the land, polygamy and human sacrifice (and all other issues) would have fallen under its jurisdiction and thereby determined to be either lawful or unlawful...."
For more, see Chapter 9 "Article 6: The Supreme Law" of free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."